http://www.zebrakick.com/blog/javascript-generic-singleton-factory/ Creative Awesome Web Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:54:20 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 http://www.zebrakick.com/blog/javascript-generic-singleton-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-152 Phetaffoninet Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:10:33 +0000 http://www.zebrakick.com/blog/?p=38#comment-152 Kick-ass blogpost, great looking blog, added it to my favorites!! Kick-ass blogpost, great looking blog, added it to my favorites!!

]]> http://www.zebrakick.com/blog/javascript-generic-singleton-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-53 Justin Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:15:50 +0000 http://www.zebrakick.com/blog/?p=38#comment-53 Actually, since in this example the singleton constructor takes no arguments, it would rely completely on getters/setters to initialize properties. However, it would be trivially simple to pass an arbitrary amount of arguments from getInstance to the specified object constructor, but it’s left as an exercise for the reader. Actually, since in this example the singleton constructor takes no arguments, it would rely completely on getters/setters to initialize properties. However, it would be trivially simple to pass an arbitrary amount of arguments from getInstance to the specified object constructor, but it’s left as an exercise for the reader.

]]> http://www.zebrakick.com/blog/javascript-generic-singleton-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-30 Andrew Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:19:55 +0000 http://www.zebrakick.com/blog/?p=38#comment-30 A flyweight might be a better approach for the task you described, instead of a singleton that relies on the objects constructor to initialize all of its properties. A flyweight might be a better approach for the task you described, instead of a singleton that relies on the objects constructor to initialize all of its properties.

]]>